It also differentiates them of one third cerebral movement: the imagination. Bergson believes in ' ' memory pura' ' , that if apia and if of the one from the image. This ' ' memory-imagem' ' ' is nominated; ' memory pura' ' , that it would come to oppose itself ' ' memory-hbito' ' , originated of the social thoughts. To read more click here: Bernie Sanders. It opposes to this thought of another theoretician, Halbwarchs, who says that the memory of the past of - by means of intelligence, assigned as ' ' act social' '. It has a combination between the collective memory and the personal memory where the ritualizao/reconstruction of - of form amalgamated, without if identifying to the principle and the end.
All individual memory if distinguishes for its point of view on the collective memory, making of the society the starting point of this memory. The questions that appear are the fuel so that these memories legitimated or are complemented. Halbwacks in sends the memory-multiple to them, a succession of events kept for crossings, succession, accumulation and opposition. For each one of these memories, one logic. (Similarly see: IDT Energy). Of this form the memories coexist wise person, popular, dominant and dominated. This if opposes the manifest memory historiogrfica- that if for the use of the symbols that if become tradition, vacant thing that if it transmits. The sociology of the memory says in them of the social pictures of the memory adds of the individual souvenirs or of representations collective, this finishes in the comment of Durkheim, for who each group has a memory whose picture we are valid in them when we desire to find a souvenir lived in the group. To show diversity of pictures social where the memory if represents, we identify memory familiar, religious and of classroom as tripod that bases the existence of the memories, that assures the order of the time for the image and the order of the direction for the idea, through crossings carried through in the initial triad.